Cyberonics reneged on its "Lifetime Reimbursement Guarantee". Click on the image to learn how you can help...
Showing posts with label mental health. Show all posts
Showing posts with label mental health. Show all posts

Monday, December 15, 2014

Denied

 

clip_image003Denied

When insurance companies deny the mentally ill the treatment their doctors prescribe, seriously ill people are often discharged, and can be a danger to themselves or others

Denied

· 2014 Dec 14

· Correspondent Scott Pelley

Editor's Note: A statement from Dr. Samuel Nussbaum, chief medical officer, Anthem, Inc.

"Mental illness impacts millions of Americans, and is a serious medical issue that demands the attention of the entire country. Throughout the care of these individuals, our behavioral health professionals explored and provided the patients and families numerous care options that went beyond their covered benefits. In our experience, successful outcomes require a partnership between patients, families, medical professionals and health plans. As a company, we are dedicated to working together to help those whose lives are affected."


The following is a script from "Denied" which aired on Dec. 14, 2014. Scott Pelley is the correspondent. Michael Rey and Oriana Zill-de Granados, producers.

Two years ago tonight, we were reeling from the shock of the murders of 20 first graders and six educators at Sandy Hook Elementary School. Since then, we've learned that the killer suffered profound mental illness. His parents sought treatment but, at least once, their health insurance provider denied payment.

Because of recurring tragedies and an epidemic of suicides, we've been investigating the battles that parents fight for psychiatric care. We found that the vast majority of claims are routine but the insurance industry aggressively reviews the cost of chronic cases. Long-term care is often denied by insurance company doctors who never see the patient. As a result, some seriously ill patients are discharged from hospitals over the objections of psychiatrists who warn that someone may die.

clip_image005

Katherine West

In the pictures, there's no sign of the torment of Katherine West. But by the age of 14 she was wasting away, purging her food. Nancy West, Katherine's mother, was told by her doctors that the bulimia was rooted in major depression.

Nancy West: In fact, prior to the eating disorder, she was cutting so there were self-harming behaviors from, I would probably say, at least 12 on.

To stop purging she had to be watched around the clock. Her doctors prescribed treatment that could cost more than $50,000 at a hospital, for 12 weeks.

Scott Pelley: The insurance company stopped paying after six weeks?

Nancy West: Six weeks pretty much was it for them. They were done. And if you know about a mental illness, you don't cure a mental illness in six weeks.

The health insurance company was Anthem, second largest in the nation. An Anthem reviewer found Katherine should leave the hospital because she had put on enough weight. Her doctor warned that she was desperate to shed those pounds.

clip_image007

Nancy West

CBS News

Nancy West: They were telling the insurance company, "She needs to stay here. She needs more long-term treatment. She isn't ready for this."

The insurance company overruled the doctor. Katherine West came home as an outpatient.

Nancy West: I was texting her, no response. I got home at 12:30 that day and I found my daughter in bed. She'd been gone for hours. And I just remember running through the house screaming. I couldn't believe it. My beautiful girl was gone. She was gone.

Katherine was dead at the age of 15. As her doctors predicted, she'd been purging again, which led to heart failure.

Scott Pelley: Did it make sense to you that a doctor at the insurance company was making these decisions based on telephone conversations?

Nancy West: No. No, they didn't observe my daughter. You're talking about a psychiatrist, a pediatrician, a therapist who observed my daughter on a daily basis. But some nameless, faceless doctor is making this decision. And I was furious. Because basically to me he was playing God with my daughter's life.

The kind of review that resulted in the discharge of Katherine West works like this; after a patient is admitted, an insurance company representative starts calling the doctor every day, or every few days. If that representative decides that the patient is ready for a lower level of care, then the case is referred to an insurance company physician who reads the file, calls the doctor and renders a judgment. We have found in these chronic, expensive cases that judgment is most often a denial. How often the results are tragic, no one can say. But we have found examples.

"...some nameless, faceless doctor is making this decision. And I was furious. Because basically to me he was playing God with my daughter's life."

In 2012, Jacob Moreno's further hospitalization was denied even after a doctor warned, "the patient states that he wanted to kill other people, many people." The next day, Moreno was naked in the street, swinging at strangers and attacking a police officer. They used a Taser to take him down. The state ordered him back to the mental hospital. Richard Traiman's hospital stay was also cut short. As he was being discharged, he said he would throw himself off a bridge. He didn't. He hung himself the next day.

Harold Koplewicz: They're called managed care, but it's really managed cost.

Dr. Harold Koplewicz knows insurance review calls well, he's a leading psychiatrist and founder of a research organization, the Child Mind Institute.

Harold Koplewicz: When I was running an inpatient unit, I would have to literally speak to a clerk on the phone to say, "I need approval for this patient to stay here another five days." And they would say to me, "Well, is the patient acutely suicidal or acutely homicidal?" "Well, not right now because he's in the hospital. We took the knife away. We took the gun away. We took the poison away." And they would say, "Well, then why does he have to be in the hospital?" You think to yourself, "Am I in--is this Oz?"

Scott Pelley: The insurance company wants to send 'em home?

Harold Koplewicz: Well, it's a lot cheaper in the short run. And if you're managing costs on a quarterly basis, you can understand why from a business point of view for that quarter it makes sense. For the sake of the child, for the sake of our society, for the sake of the child's future it doesn't make any sense

Of all the cases we looked at, one of the most revealing was Ashley's. She suffers from bipolar disorder.

Ashley: In 2012, I had had a suicide attempt. I couldn't find a way out.

Scott Pelley: Was this a cry for help or did you want to die?

Ashley: This one was real. I was alone. I tried my best.

Ashley's mother, Maria, asked us not to mention the family name.

Maria: One of the doctors told me on the phone, "I'm really sorry, but you will probably bury your daughter."

In 2012, Ashley was in the hospital for the fourth time that year. They thought they had taken away everything that could hurt her. But she smashed her cell phone and cut her wrists with the glass.

Scott Pelley: What did that tell you, in terms of the treatment that she needed?

Maria: It told me that she needed long-term treatment to survive.

Maria says that Anthem recommended treatment at Timberline Knolls, a residential facility. A doctor said Ashley needed 90 days. But after sending her to Illinois from California, Anthem denied payment after six days saying that Ashley could be, "safely treated with outpatient services."

Scott Pelley: Did the people at Timberline Knolls believe that?

Maria: No, they didn't--

Scott Pelley: That she was well?

Maria: No. They absolutely didn't believe it. They gave us the option of paying $22,000. For-- to complete the 30 days. And at that, we-- there wasn't a chance that we could do that.

Now, look at how Ashley's care was denied. This log shows Dr. Tim Jack, a psychiatrist working on behalf of Anthem, called Ashley's doctor three times in 32 minutes. One call was disconnected. He left two messages. Dr. Jack waited 22 minutes for a call back, and then denied coverage. From the first call to denial, 54 minutes, speaking to no one.

Why so fast? Well, it may be, in part, because many insurance doctors are paid by the case. Dr. Jack, is a contractor who gets $45 per patient. In court records, Dr. Jack says he does 550 reviews a month. So, working from home, that comes to $25,000 a month. We spoke to 26 psychiatrists from across the country, and every one brought up Dr. Jack's name. Some called him "Dr. Denial." This is a recording of Dr. Jack telling a physician that a patient's level of care should be lowered.

Dr. Tim Jack: Because given what his current progress is and his current symptoms are, he can be managed at a lower level of care as effectively as in an intensive outpatient program.

Doctor: You know doctor, I just want to say that I have spoken to you on so many different occasions, and with so many different clients, and I've never really had a positive outcome as far as authorization from you, so...I just needed to bring that to your attention.

Dr. Tim Jack: This is not a personal matter.

Doctor: I understand sir, but the client appears to meet the criteria, so...

We found Dr. Jack's denial rate averaged 92 percent in one six month period in 2011. But that was typical among 11 reviewers contracted by Anthem. Some of them had denial rates of 95 and 100 percent.

Scott Pelley: What's the impact on a family after a phone call like that?

Kathryn Trepinski: Devastating.

Kathryn Trepinski is a lawyer who represents patients. She does not represent Ashley's family, but she has filed suit against Anthem and other insurers.

Kathryn Trepinski: There's untold suffering and the family is usually left in the very difficult-- position of either paying for the care out of pocket, which is tens of thousands of dollars. Or they say no to their loved one, to their child.

Anthem says that reviews are checked by a supervising doctor but when we obtained Ashley's denial letter we found her review by Tim Jack, MD, was supervised by Timothy Jack, MD.

Scott Pelley: So he signs the documents twice?

Kathryn Trepinski: Yes, except that he doesn't actually sign them himself. It's a robo-signature.

Dr. Jack has acknowledged an Anthem computer put his name to letters he doesn't see and on cases he didn't review.

Kathryn Trepinski: It suggests a layer of review that's not there. Because the signing doctor is described in the letter as having made that coverage determination and he didn't.

We tried to reach Dr. Jack in calls and a letter. We stopped by his home. But he declined to speak. Katherine West's and Ashley's parents gave us permission to ask Anthem about their cases. Anthem declined an interview but its chief medical officer wrote that they, "explored and provided the...families numerous care options that went beyond their covered benefits." He goes on to say "successful outcomes require a partnership between [sic] patients, families, medical professionals and health plans."

For the insurance industry's view, we found Anthem's former California medical director, Dr. Paul Keith. He retired in March after years supervising Anthem reviews, including those of Dr. Jack. He told us that, too often insurance companies are abused by care providers.

clip_image009

Dr. Paul Keith

CBS News

Dr. Paul Keith: Doctors will spin the clinical information. They will make things appear more serious than, perhaps, they are, because they feel strongly the patient needs this level of care for a little longer. So you do have a somewhat adversarial relationship between the reviewer and the attending physician.

Scott Pelley: You're saying the-- the doctor will overstate the case to get the insurance company to approve the client?

Dr. Paul Keith: Unquestionably that happens. Not all the time and I've been doing this for, you know, over 30 years.

Scott Pelley: You describe these conversations as "adversarial," is that best for the patient?

Dr. Paul Keith: Well, it's like our legal system if you, each side, does a good job in presenting their case and asking the right questions, you ultimately arrive at the truth.

Scott Pelley: But these can be life and death decisions and you don't know till it's too late.

"Doctors will spin the clinical information. They will make things appear more serious than, perhaps, they are, because they feel strongly the patient needs this level of care for a little longer..."

Dr. Paul Keith: I cannot, offhand, think of a situation where a decision was made to discharge a patient from a hospital and some terrible consequence occurred soon thereafter. I'm sure it happens, but--

Scott Pelley: We found quite a few.

Dr. Paul Keith: I'd have to look at them to see. There's one that occurs to me that I was involved with where the child left the hospital with his parents, escaped from his parents, drove cross country to another state, and days later, committed suicide. Keeping that individual in the hospital longer is not likely to have made any difference.

Scott Pelley: I would have to imagine that the parents would say, "If you'd kept him in the hospital, he wouldn't have been in another state killing himself."

Dr. Paul Keith: Parents become fearful that if they leave too soon, the same thing's gonna happen that may have happened in previous occasions, but you can't keep an individual in the hospital forever.

Scott Pelley: So to the parent who says the insurance company is just trying to get my child out of the hospital, you say what?

Dr. Paul Keith: It's half true; the insurance company may very well want that child to go to a lesser level of care, but money is not the basis for the decision.

Scott Pelley: A lot of people watching this interview are gonna have trouble with the idea that insurance companies are not trying to save money.

Dr. Paul Keith: Of course, your insurance companies are trying to save money. There's a lot of treatment that is not medically necessary that is provided, and that is a waste of healthcare dollars and the resources are scarce.

Ashley's family hired a lawyer and appealed to the California Insurance Board which overturned Anthem's denials. Now, she is in treatment for bipolar disorder, treatment that may last a lifetime. Katherine West was buried a year ago this month, her mother has filed suit against Anthem.

After the mass murder at Newtown, the state of Connecticut's Sandy Hook Commission studied mental health. A draft of its upcoming report calls the insurance review process a "formidable barrier... to care" and recommends a state agency review all denials.

© 2014 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.

· clip_image011

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/mental-illness-health-care-insurance-60-minutes/

29

Comments

29 comments

Post comment

 

herb1008 5ptsFeatured
57 minutes ago

Dear Mr. Pelley,

Nice media presentation on your part except for the fact it doesn’t even scratch the surface of the inequities, discrimination and subterfuge perpetrated against those with mental health issues.

I have been battling with HHS and CMS as well as Madam Secretary Sylvia Mathews Burwell as well as Stephen J. Hemsley - CEO, United Healthcare to rightfully cover patients who have benefitted from VNS Therapy for Depression.

How’s about this fact?I finally cajoled CMS to cover the Medicare/Medicaid study subjects and patients for their medical insurance.Here’s the sad joke.United Healthcare as a result of CMS’s prompting has covered Medicare patients but refused to cover private pay patients.Same company, same therapy but Stephen J. Hemsley - CEO, United Healthcare, who’ve I written to many times, refuses to cover at least one of his private pay patients.

Volunteer study subjects with implanted medical devices left to their own challenges to obtain medical coverage and care.Screwed up and discriminatory mental health care system; you bet.

My efforts to overcome this abortion can be found in my writings on blog site:

http://www.vnstherapy-herb.blogspot.com

Mr. Pelley if you’d like another interesting and convoluted story to add to your portfolio I’m readily available to share details.

Sincerely,

Herb

Joyce and Herbert Stein

1008 Trailmore Lane

Weston, FL 33326-2816

(954) 349-8733

vnsdepression@gmail.com

http://www.vnstherapy-herb.blogspot.com

http://www.vnstherapy.wordpress.com

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/mental-illness-health-care-insurance-60-minutes/

Friday, November 21, 2014

Need to see a psychiatrist? Call your insurance company first

21 November 2014, 9.24pm AEDT

Need to see a psychiatrist? Call your insurance company first

Author
  1. Tara F Bishop

    Assistant Professor of Healthcare Policy and Research, Assistant Professor of Medicine at Cornell University

Disclosure Statement

Tara F Bishop receives funding from the National Institute on Aging, the Commonwealth Fund, the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, and the Physician's Foundation.

The Conversation is funded by CSIRO, Melbourne, Monash, RMIT, UTS, UWA, ACU, ANU, ASB, Baker IDI, Canberra, CDU, Curtin, Deakin, Flinders, Griffith, the Harry Perkins Institute, JCU, La Trobe, Massey, Murdoch, Newcastle, UQ, QUT, SAHMRI, Swinburne, Sydney, UNDA, UNE, UniSA, USC, USQ, UTAS, UWS, VU and Wollongong.

 

Not everyone can pay out of pocket. Stock image of counseling session via Monkey Business Images/Shutterstock

Last week, a patient contacted me to find a psychiatrist because his anxiety was beginning to get out of control. He wanted to see someone who could do therapy and prescribe medications if he needed them. I gave him some names but warned him that none of them took insurance. If he wanted to find a psychiatrist that took his insurance, he’d need to call his insurance company to find one.

And this situation is not uncommon in my primary care practice. I can treat simple psychiatric conditions like depression and anxiety but, like many internists, I do not have the training to provide therapy or treat more severe psychiatric conditions. If a patients needs psychiatric care, the best I can do is to offer them some recommendations and tell them to contact their insurance company. As you can imagine, this poses a barrier for patients trying to access the psychiatric care they need.

Half of psychiatrists do not take insurance

This motivated me to study psychiatrists and insurance. Last year, a team of researchers and I published a study using data from a national survey of doctors examining this issue.

We found that almost half of psychiatrists take don’t take health insurance – whether it’s private health insurance, Medicare (insurance for the elderly), or Medicaid (insurance for the poor).

Specifically, we found that in 2009 to 2010, only 55% of psychiatrists took private health insurance, 55% took Medicare and 43% took Medicaid. This presents a significant barrier for patients who need to see psychiatrists.

It’s important to emphasize that this was a sharp contrast to every other type of doctor. For example, 94% of cardiologists took private health insurance during that same time period and 95% of general internists took Medicare. When pooled together, 88% of physicians all specialties other than psychiatry took private health insurance and 86% took Medicare. Acceptance rates for Medicaid were low overall because reimbursement rates are low. Nevertheless, psychiatrists had some of the lowest Medicaid acceptance rates of all specialties.

The results shocked us and when our study was published last year, we learned that the results also shocked the general public.

Doctors, patients and reporters corroborated our findings. I started to hear more and more stories of patients who struggled to find a psychiatrist who took their insurance.

Less money for more work

So why is this the case? First, low reimbursement may be a problem. Medicare pays US$130 to US$140 for a new visit to a psychiatrist. Although that rate is not much different from a visit to a primary care doctor, visits to psychiatrists may be longer because they involve counseling and therapy.

Second, a shortage of psychiatrists may also be factor. From 2000 to 2008, 14% fewer medical students chose to pursue careers in psychiatry and 55% of psychiatrists are over 55 and close to retirement age. As a result, many psychiatrists may have so much demand for their services that they do not need to accept insurance.

Finally, psychiatrists may not have or need the administrative capacity that other doctors need. A psychiatrist may be able to function without a lot of staff like nurses, medical assistants, and administrative assistants. Because of this some psychiatrists may not be motivated to hire that staff just to interact with insurance companies.

Possible solutions

Since the time of our study, our team has been developing ways to further study the problem but also to explore solutions.

One obvious step is to increase reimbursement for mental health-care. But such changes can be difficult. Medicare relies on a review panel of physicians to change reimbursement and it is unclear whether that panel will suggest increased reimbursement for psychiatrists.

But there are other promising options that make it easier for patients to access mental health care. For example, the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene runs a program called Lifenet which patients can call to find a psychiatrist or other mental health provider in New York City who takes their insurance.

Another very effective program, called Impact, was developed by faculty at the University of Washington and helps primary care physicians treat depression. A nurse, social worker or psychologist works closely with patients in the primary care doctor’s office and has a designated psychiatrist to help with patients who are not improving.

These are good starts but much more needs to be done in order to ensure access to psychiatrists across the board. For now, I have told my patient that he will probably have to pay for his psychiatric care even though he has insurance or will have to find someone who takes his insurance without my help.

Hopefully in the future, we will have more options for him.

http://theconversation.com/need-to-see-a-psychiatrist-call-your-insurance-company-first-33874

Wednesday, July 11, 2012

Patients need drug options, not limitations


THE HILL
comment
Print

Patients need drug options, not limitations

By Michael J. Fitzpatrick, executive director, National Alliance on Mental Illness - 07/09/12 02:50 PM ET
Imagine being sick with a life-threatening disease. Most of us would want access to as many medicines as possible -- including the full range of proven treatment options. 


But under the Affordable Care Act, some people may see their drug choices severely restricted.




A draft regulation proposed by the Department of Health and Human Services would require insurers participating in the law's new exchanges to cover only a single drug in each class of pharmaceuticals. 

That could be a disaster for both patients and doctors. Those living with chronic conditions -- think serious mental illness, HIV-AIDS, epilepsy, or kidney disease -- would be hit particularly hard. "One-size-fits-all" may work for baseball hats, but medication requires a far more individualized approach. Doctors know that each patient responds differently to treatment. Patients need all the options they can get. 


That's part of the reason Medicare's prescription drug benefit has been so important. Medicare Part D requires participating plans to cover at least two different drugs in most every class of pharmaceutical -- and nearly all drugs in six important classes: immunosuppressants, antidepressants, antipsychotics, anticonvulsants, antiretrovirals, and antineoplastics.


Medicare Part D's requirements were designed to ensure continuity and access for vulnerable patients. Its rules should be a model for the new regulation.


Similar drugs within the same category can have dramatically different results among patients. A drug that works for your neighbor might not work for you

.
Choice works in tandem with innovation to give patients the best chance of recovery. Requiring insurers to cover just a single drug in each class would likely cause many to skip covering new drugs, even if they represent clinical improvements in efficacy and/or safety.


This issue is especially important for the mental health community. Diagnoses in serious mental illness remain imprecise. It is not uncommon for a patient to receive multiple inaccurate diagnoses over several years before being correctly diagnosed and receiving effective treatment.


Persons with depression, bipolar disorder, or schizophrenia don't always respond to their first or second rounds of treatment -- and often require multiple attempts with multiple combinations of medications before something finally succeeds. There's no way of knowing in advance exactly what will work. This is why doctors and patients need all available options.


Research into drug access for Medicaid beneficiaries starkly illustrates the problem of restrictions on medicines. According to one recent study, psychiatric patients with medication access issues had three times the rate of suicidal thoughts and behavior. When these patients were forced to switch drugs because of a lack of coverage, they reported far higher rates of hospitalization, homelessness, and incarceration. 


When it comes to prescription drug coverage, what patients need most is access and choice. 

The Department of Health and Human Services understands this issue. Indeed, this same draft regulation about the healthcare law's exchanges contains strong language ensuring "mental health parity," which requires insurers to cover both mental and physical health equally. Prescription drug coverage should not fall short of this standard for equitable coverage. 


The Department of Health and Human Services is expected to make its final ruling on drug access in the insurance exchanges within the next two weeks. Between now and then, it's imperative that Department officials revise this regulation to protect patients. 


Fitzpatrick is executive director at NAMI, the National Alliance on Mental Illness.
Source:
http://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/healthcare/236763-patients-need-drug-options-not-limitations