Cyberonics reneged on its "Lifetime Reimbursement Guarantee". Click on the image to learn how you can help...
Showing posts with label Noninvasive vagus nerve stimulation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Noninvasive vagus nerve stimulation. Show all posts

Friday, January 30, 2015

electroCore’s non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation therapy safe, effective across a variety of conditions

electroCore’s non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation therapy safe, effective across a variety of conditions

Published on January 29, 2015 at 8:44 AM ·

Non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation (nVNS) ‘improves the safety and tolerability of
VNS making it more accessible and facilitating further investigations across a wide range of uses when compared with surgically implanted VNS’ according to a review in the European Journal of Neurology. The review then went on to look at the efficacy of both surgically implanted VNS and non-invasive VNS including electroCore’s gammaCore device.

Professor Stephen Silberstein of Thomas Jefferson University – one of the authors of the paper – commented:

This review confirms that nVNS is safe and effective and because there is no surgery involved and because the costs are very competitive we believe it could open up a whole variety of conditions which we have responded to vagus nerve stimulation.

Related Stories

The Cyberonics VNS implant which has a licence in North America and Europe for refractory epilepsy and depression has been implanted in more than 70,000 patients over the last twenty years and has been found to be helpful to patients with several other conditions including headache, anxiety, gastric obesity and other conditions. However because of the high cost of treatment and the involvement of a surgical procedure these conditions were never researched in depth or brought to market.

JP Errico, CEO and founder of electroCore, commented:

This paper again validates how safe and effective VNS therapy is. It also shows how our gammaCore device can eliminate the surgical side effects and still provide effective stimulation. Our extensive pre-clinical and clinical program is already demonstrating how effective this treatment is across a variety of conditions.

electroCore has developed non-invasive Vagus Nerve Stimulation (nVNS) self-administered therapies for the treatment of multiple conditions in neurology, psychiatry, gastroenterology and respiratory fields. The company’s initial focus is on the treatment of primary headaches (migraine and cluster headache), and the associated chronic co-morbidities of gastric motility, psychiatric, sleep, and pain disorders that drive disproportionately large direct and indirect costs within the healthcare system and society.

Source:

http://www.electrocoremedical.com/

http://www.news-medical.net/news/20150129/electroCoree28099s-non-invasive-vagus-nerve-stimulation-therapy-safe-effective-across-a-variety-of-conditions.aspx

Wednesday, June 26, 2013

Positive Pilot Study of Noninvasive Vagus Nerve Stimulation for Acute Treatment of Migraine

Nonpharmacologic Therapy   ISSUE: JUNE 2013 | VOLUME: 11  

Positive Pilot Study of Noninvasive Vagus Nerve Stimulation for Acute Treatment of Migraine

  image

 An open-label, multicenter, pilot study suggests that noninvasive vagus nerve stimulation (nVNS) can be effective for acute treatment of migraine.   

An analysis of 25 women and two men treated with nVNS for migraine with or without aura showed that patients were pain-free two hours after treatment in 38% of mild migraine attacks and 22% of moderate or severe attacks. Twelve of the patients had adverse events, but all were mild or moderate, according to a presentation of the results by Peter Goadsby, MD, PhD, at the American Academy of Neurology’s 2013 annual meeting, held recently in San Diego.

 “Noninvasive or transcutaneous VNS is well tolerated and seems to be effective in acute migraine,” concluded Dr. Goadsby, professor of neurology at the University of California, San Francisco. “This points to the importance of getting on with controlled trials—and indeed there are two studies each in Europe and the U.S. under way already.”   

Ana Recober, MD, assistant professor of neurology at the University of Iowa, University Heights, chaired the session at which Dr. Goadsby presented the data. She praised the results as being “exciting” and warranting “follow-up with a larger randomized, double-blinded, sham-controlled clinical trial.”   

“The headache community is looking for new, innovative acute-migraine treatments, and non-medicinal therapies with minimal side effects are very attractive,” said Todd Rozen, MD, director, Geisinger Headache Center, Geisinger Health System, Wilkes-Barre, Pa. “The two-hour data for pain freedom and pain relief in the study are promising, but the investigators didn’t indicate whether the pain returns within 24 hours, or even within four hours for that matter. Also, no data were presented on what happened to migrainous-associated symptoms—such as nausea and vomiting—with treatment.”   

He agreed that results from the controlled trials would be useful.    Dr. Goadsby said data on migraine symptoms up to 24 hours post-treatment would be included in a paper that is being prepared for submission to a medical journal.   

The pilot study was paid for by ElectroCore, which makes the gammaCore device that was used in the study. The goal was to build on several published case series on use of nVNS that showed it relieved some patients’ migraine symptoms (see, e.g., Cephalalgia 2005;25:82-86).   

The participants had a median age of 39 years. Each was treated with nVNS for four consecutive migraine attacks, either with immediate treatment for moderate or severe attacks, or after 20 minutes of mild pain. Each treatment consisted of one 90-second dose followed by another dose 15 minutes later.   

The initial study population included 30 individuals but three did not have any attacks treated; thus, the intent-to-treat group comprised 27 subjects. In that group, there were 84 attacks, 55 of which were moderate or severe. In 10 of the mild attacks (38%) and in 12 of the moderate or severe attacks (22%), the patients were pain-free after two hours.   

Three patients experienced neck twitching at the location of the treatment; one had neck redness; and another reported a raspy voice. The adverse effects all were only present during the stimulation time and resolved spontaneously.

 —Rosemary Frei, MSc

   Dr. Goadsby is a consultant with ElectroCore. Drs. Recober and Rozen did not disclose any relevant conflicts of interest.   

 http://www.painmedicinenews.com/ViewArticle.aspx?d=Nonpharmacologic%2BTherapy&d_id=84&i=June+2013&i_id=963&a_id=23359

Tuesday, March 26, 2013

Noninvasive, Hand-held Device Promising for Migraine

Noninvasive, Hand-held Device Promising for Migraine

Caroline Cassels

Mar 26, 2013
                                                                                               
San Diego, California — Noninvasive vagus nerve stimulation (nVNS) using a portable, hand-held device may offer an effective, well tolerated, and safe treatment for acute migraine, preliminary research suggests.

A small, open-label pilot study conducted by investigators at the University of Southern California San Francisco (UCSF) showed nVNS reduced pain and increased pain-free status in a group of migraine patients with, and without, aura.

According to principal investigator Peter Goadsby, MB, BS, although the findings are preliminary, they offer the hope of an effective treatment without many of the adverse effects associated with current migraine treatments, which include triptans, ergotamine, antiepileptics, and antidepressants.
In addition, he noted, over the past 5 to 7 years there has been a trend toward developing neuromodulation treatments with implantable devices. He added that if it proves effective, this hand-held, portable, and noninvasive modality would be a step up.

"The nice thing about external devices is if they don't work [the patient] can give them back and you don't have to do anything complex. One of the problems we have with internal devices at the moment is that they are expensive to do, they're relatively invasive and things can go wrong — not big things, but still.

"If you give me a device that can help 20% of my patients then will be a happy man, particularly if I don't do any harm to any of them," Dr. Goadsby told delegates here at the American Academy of Neurology (AAN) 65th Annual Meeting.

Results
Dr. Goadsby, who is director of UCSF's Headache Center, said the move to develop noninvasive neuromodulation approaches came from a number of clinical observations, the seminal one being the case of a young man who was treated with a VNS implant for intractable epilepsy.
The treatment failed to control his seizures, but clinicians noted that he became migraine free. The report was published in 2002 in Cephalagia.

For the pilot study the investigators recruited 30 patients — 25 females and 5 males — with a median age of 39 who had episodic migraine with and without aura.

Patients were asked to treat 3 attacks over the 6-week study period. The treatment consisted two 90-second doses at 15-minute intervals delivered to the right cervical branch of the vagus nerve. Patients were asked to self-treat once pain became moderate severe or after 20 minutes of mild pain.

Essentially, said Dr. Goadsby, the device was placed on the right side of the neck, and a thumbwheel allowed patients to turn the electrical stimulator up or down.

Three of the study participants experienced no attacks, so the final analysis was based on 27 patients and 84 treated attacks.

Data for the first attack among patients with moderate and severe pain showed that 4 of 19 patients (21%) were pain free at 2 hours and 8 of 19 (42%) had pain relief that decreased to nil or mild at 2 hours.

Results for those with mild pain at first attack showed 5 of 8 (63%) were pain free at 2 hours.
When researchers examined the effect of the device on all migraine attacks, they found that 12 of 55 (22%) patients with moderate to severe migraine and 10 of 26 (38%) with mild migraine were pain free at 2 hours.

Mild, Infrequent Adverse Effects
Adverse events were infrequent and mild and included neck twitching (n = 3), raspy voice (n = 1), and neck redness (n = 1).

Dr. Goadsby noted that the sensation patients experience from the device is not pleasant but also not unpleasant.

These findings, he said, warrant further investigation in randomized, placebo-controlled trials and added that a sham device is being developed.

Future studies of the device will examine whether there are treatment differences between the right and left sides of the neck, as well as the treatment durability.

Noninvasive neuromodulation, said Dr. Goadsby, has much to offer migraineurs.

"If we can develop noninvasive treatments for even a small group of patients that would be a helluva step forward," he said.

Warrants Further Study
Commenting on the study for Medscape Medical News, Tobias Kurth, MD, director of research, Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale (INSERM), University of Bordeaux, Talence, France, and associate epidemiologist, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, agreed that the data are "convincing enough to warrant further study."

"If this turns out to be an effective treatment it would add to the treatment options for migraine with a device that is almost free of side effects," said Dr. Kurth.

He noted that about 30% of migraineurs do not respond to therapy and so novel treatment approaches are urgently needed.

Dr. Kurth added that although invasive neurostimulation for severe migraine has demonstrated some benefit, he remains unconvinced that it is a good treatment option for even in this severely affected population.

On the basis of the data at this point, he said, in his opinion it should be considered a "last resort" treatment in severely affected patients for whom nothing else has worked.

On the other hand, by eliminating the need for surgery and its related risks and adverse effects, nVNS may have potential as a viable treatment option for at least a proportion of patients with migraine, he added.

"It will not be for everybody for sure but even if it works for a small fraction of patients for whom no other medication seems to work this would be a huge success," said Dr. Kurth.

Dr. Goadsby reports he has received $2000 in direct compensation related to the presentation from the device manufacturer. Funding from the study came from multiple sources, most prominently from the Sandler Family Trust and the Department of Defense. Dr. Goadsby also reports the device manufacturer had no role in the study's data collection or analysis. Dr. Kurth has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.
                    
American Academy of Neurology (AAN) 65th Annual Meeting. Abstract S40.004. Presented March 20, 2013.
 

http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/781443