From: Herbert Stein [mailto:fabrik@bellsouth.net]
Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2015 4:48 AM
To: Madam Secretary Sylvia Matthews Burwell, United States Secretary of Health and Human Services
Subject: VNS Therapy for Depression - “HHS/CMS we have a failure to communicate!”
Dear Madam Secretary Burwell,
I’d like to take a moment to commend and compliment Ms. Gaetana Marshall, M.S. Health Insurance Specialist out of your Atlanta, GA regional office for the time and effort she put into listening to my explanations and researching the document(s) you folks in D.C. recently sent to her office relating to my supposed issue(s) that I have been advocating to resolve these past two years. Ms. Marshall in turn forwarded the documents (copy and pasted below) for me to read and I in turn share for everyone’s perusal. At the same time I would also like to acknowledge the concerted efforts on the part of Ms. Courtney S. Turner, MPH - Office of Hearings and Inquiries, Medicare Ombudsman Group, Division of Medicare Ombudsman Assistance who respectfully assisted in my advocacy and has helped several of the VNS Depression patients receive medical care these past couple of years and to Ms. Stephany Terry – CMS for following up on my telephone call to Ms. Lisa Spradlin – CMS yesterday in the absence of Ms. Courtney Turner.
I’m sure Madam Secretary that you are familiar with these famous words, “Houston, we have a problem!” And shortly thereafter the intellectual minds at another of our government agencies, NASA, effectively, efficiently and expeditiously went to work solving a life and death crisis in a matter of days.
Well Madam Secretary I’ve come to the conclusion the same is not true for your agencies handling and effectiveness as it relates to the health care for the implanted VNS Depression patients.
In fact what I discern in this instance is “HHS/CMS we have a failure to communicate!” as well as what appears to be a classic illustration of the Tower of Babel.
In absolutely none of my advocacy/activism these past two (2) years have I advocated for approval of the VNS Therapy for Depression or the reversal of the May 4, 2007 denial. That is the responsibility of the sponsor, Cyberonics and yet the communications I constantly receive from your agency refer me to the CMS denial decision of May 4, 2007. Believe me I’ve carefully read that decision a number of times and I am cognizant of its contents.
What I specifically and rightfully have advocated for is care and health insurance coverage which CMS egregiously, immorally and/or unconscionably omitted or overlooked in that decision whether through ineptitude, ignorance or failure to grandfather-in-care for all the study subjects and patients implanted with this medical device prior to May 4, 2007 in accordance with the doctrine of “Continuity of care” contained in several CMS documents.
Obviously not all your subordinates understand, comprehend or obtained any message that CMS recognizes and acknowledges the medical doctrine of “Continuity of Care” as was reiterated by CMS most recent DBA adjudicated decision of December 30, 2014. These patients are rightfully to be cared for and covered by medical insurance. The CMS decision of May 4, 2007 does not apply to these previously implanted patients. Is that too difficult for your people to read and comprehend?
beneficiaries, say the Aggrieved Parties, the NCD does not afford coverage for: (1) “the
interrogation and calibration of a VNS therapy device implanted and deemed to be
reasonable and medically necessary when implanted for TRD”; or (2) “for the
replacement of the implanted pulse generator device upon battery expiration, when
required[.]” AP Statement ¶ 43. According to the Aggrieved Parties, those omissions
conflict with: (1) “continuity of care” standards that are “widely accepted within the
medical community (i.e., a physician should not discontinue treatment that is effective for
a patient)”; (2) “well-accepted medical standards of care that acknowledge that it is
unsafe for beneficiaries to have an implanted medical device that is not properly
calibrated, monitored, or is otherwise non-functional”; and (3) “CMS policy statements
wherein CMS has recognized that continuing Medicare coverage for beneficiaries who
received Medicare-covered durable medical equipment (DME) before it was non-covered
‘helps avoid disrupting the continuity of care for the beneficiaries . . . .’” Id. ¶¶ 40-42
(quoting 78 Fed. Reg. 40,836, 40,877 (July 8, 2013)).”
“CMS states that it “leaves decisions
regarding the maintenance of already-implanted devices to contractor discretion” and that
such decisions “are, appropriately, made on an ad hoc basis after the local contractor’s
consideration of the applicable facts.” Id. We understand from these representations that
CMS and its contractors do not, or will not in the future, apply NCD 160.18(C) to bar
coverage of maintenance services – including replacement of the implanted VNS device
upon battery expiration – for beneficiaries who received the VNS device prior to May 4,
Yet I continue to receive communications from your agency citing the May 4, 2007 decision. Obviously the proper communications from your office in the words of former President Regan are not having a “trickle down” effect. For the umpteenth time please have your agency and your subordinates notify MAC, Regional Agencies, State Agencies, contractors etc., etc. that based upon the reaffirmation of the DBA adjudicated decision of December 30, 2014 that all VNS Depression patients implanted prior to May 4, 2007 are to be covered for medical care and health insurance coverage and there should be absolutely no need for these patients to have go through an appeals process as a result of your agencies inability to communicate this fact with one another.
Why must I continue to receive communications citing denials and reference to the May 4, 2007 as was recently illustrated in a communication dated July 17, 2015 from Kristen Dixon - Health Insurance Specialist - Atlanta Division of Financial Management & Fee for Service Operations (see below) and an earlier letter dated April 17, 2015 from Patrick Conway, MD, MSc - Acting Principal Deputy Administrator - Deputy Administrator for Innovation and Quality – CMS Chief Medical Officer (see below).
Why not a letter, directive or whatever document you issue to your MAC agencies, Regional office agencies, State Agencies, contractors etc., etc. apprising them of the doctrine of “Continuity of Care” and the DBA adjudicated decision of December 30, 2014 favorably affecting the VNS Therapy patients for depression? Stop all this negativity, denials, oversight and appeal non-sense being referenced to the May 4, 2007 denial decision when in fact the December 30, 2014 decision clearly indicates these medical device implanted patients have rights to medical care and health insurance coverage.
And to those private health insurance CEO’s I have also addressed and hounded you too have unjustly denied care and medical insurance coverage to these patients and similarly you should be issuing directives to your staff that these patients should be properly cared for and rightly insured.
Take a positive approach to wellness. Advise all your agencies and health insurance carriers that the previously implanted VNS patients for depression are rightfully entitled to medical care and coverage without need for any denials or subsequent appeals!
Lastly, I’ll also take the liberty to remind you and all those agency staffers who read this communication:
Sincerely,
Herb
Joyce and Herbert Stein
1008 Trailmore Lane
Weston, FL 33326-2816
(954) 349-8733
http://www.vnstherapy-herb.blogspot.com
http://www.vnstherapy.wordpress.com
---------------------------------------------------------------
NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY / Disclaimer
---------------------------------------------------------------
Disclaimer: This E-Mail is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 2510-2521 and is legally privileged. The information contained in this E-Mail is intended only for use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you receive this E-Mail in error, please notify the sender immediately at the email address and/or phone number above and delete the information from your computer. Please do not copy or use it for any purpose nor disclose its contents to any other person.
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message including attachments, if any, is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail, destroy all copies of the original message, and do not disseminate it further. If you are the intended recipient but do not wish to receive communications through this medium, please advise the sender immediately.
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
From: Marshall, Gaetana (CMS/CMHPO) [mailto:Gaetana.Marshall@cms.hhs.gov]
Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2015 7:59 AM
To: Herbert Stein (fabrik@bellsouth.net)
Subject: C1502484607 Re. Mr. H. Stein
Good morning Mr. Stein,
Since our telephone conversation on Friday I have had an opportunity to follow up from discussions we had and to speak with a few of my CMS colleagues who have responsibility for standard Medicare A/B policy decisions. Notably, I have spoken to Courtney Turner who works with the CMS Ombudsman team and the management team for Medicare A/B policy decisions.
They have provided me with the following items for your records and information:
A. A Beneficiary Casework Call (August 2014) presentation regarding VNS coverage.
B. A Sept. 24, 2013 letter from the Atlanta Division of Financial Management Fee for Service Operations responding to the Honorable Debbie Wasserman Schultz on behalf of your wife regarding health insurance coverage of Vague Nerve Stimulation (VNS) for the treatment of depression.
C. The CMS Ombudsman’s response from January 2015 regarding the Division of Appeal Board’s (DAB) decision.
D. The April 17, 2015 letter from the CMS Center for Clinical Standards and Quality formally responding to you (on behalf of Secretary of Health and Human Services) regarding the DAB decision.
E. A July 17, 2015 letter from the Atlanta Division of Financial Management Fee for Service Operations responding to you regarding the health insurance coverage of Vague Nerve Stimulation (VNS) for the treatment of depression.
The documents above are official CMS responses to your questions regarding Medicare Advantage plan coverage for VNS treatment for depression since MA coverage is established by standard A/B policy. Additionally, the 2014/2015 DAB appeal decision attached upheld CMS’ policy. As such, the attached CMS letters are considered comprehensive and fully respond to questions regarding health insurance coverage of VNS for treatment of depression.
I would like to thank your patience and for the opportunity to speak with you and thank you for your advocacy regarding those suffering with depression and VNS therapy.
It was my pleasure to assist you.
Very truly,
Gaetana Marshall
Ms. Gaetana Marshall, M.S.
Health Insurance Specialist
US Department of Health and Human Services
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
Division of Medicare Health Plans Operations
61 Forsyth Street, Suite 4T20
Atlanta, Georgia 30303
Ofc: 404-562-3562
Fax: 443-380-5963
Email: gaetana.marshall@cms.hhs.gov
Please consider the environment before printing this email.
INFORMATION NOT RELEASABLE TO THE PUBLIC UNLESS AUTHORIZED BY LAW:
This information has not been publicly disclosed and may be privileged and confidential. It is for internal government use only and must not be disseminated, distributed, or copied to persons not authorized to receive the information. Unauthorized disclosure may result in prosecution to the full extent of the law. If you are the unintended recipient of this information please notify the sender.
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
No comments:
Post a Comment